Club of "White protesters". Entrepreneur in policewoman the state. Zozulya Yuriy.

 

- So, what can we do? We can't protest, we can't do anything. Although, on the other hand, we see, some people are allowed to protest for some reason. You can go and criticize one of the mayors here.

Here, tens of thousands of people can march to an enemy church, and it's all fine, with the police escorting them. Is it still possible to have a civil society during wartime? Maybe businesses should resort to some kind of actions, I don't know. -

Zozulya Yuriy

But this "White businesses" (state legitimate business), a club of "White protesters”. They can do anything.

watch the video with English subtitles

So, we were also curious about this. How does it happen that we submit an application, for example, for some event, and they say: "No, that's it. We'll shut you down, arrest you, or even shoot you." and so on. But then we see a crowd come out, chanting and no one touches them, police protecting them and even pushing others away to make sure no one offends them. So, it's all part of the "White Club protesters” who have preferences. They are untouchable. Just as the business is untouchable, the protesters are also untouchable. But what tools exists still ? Indeed, businessmen are often systematic, primarily, for example, mathematicians.

Therefore, of course, we have made our plans, in case of the possibility of such protests and so on, when everything has already reached the handle, when it will be completely impossible. In addition,

Marauder Data Base “Мaraderez”

We have created our data bases.For example, there is something called, in our case, it's referred to in the "Manifesto42" with a long name. There is a “Coalition of business communities” and “Associations of veterans” , you may know, such congresses there, Dligach or Pozyiak lead it. We are more involved in a militant and protest-oriented organization because we are from Automaidan, we have such a “combat wing”. And when we talk there,

We have something like a marauder, where we know exactly that there was oppression here, and here was embezzlement and so on, and these were prosecutors, investigators and judges. We can't do anything against them now, but we have written them out in our database, it's right on the website. And we know that the moment will come when we will go out and go to their estates, and take away their assets, just the way it was with yanukovych, or we will go to protest under the authorities where they work. But we are documenting civil society within the system.

NIB - this is a National Investigation Bureau,

Public oversight documents their crimes, and in addition, we have done our own bureau -called NIB (NBR), there is the DBR - the state bureau of repression. And now there is the NIB - - this is a National Investigation Bureau, where well-known associations are involved. I don’t even remember exactly what was there several lawyer groups were also represented at our roundtable

There are representatives from the NACA (The National Anti-Corruption Agency), there are representatives - former prosecutors, who worked at the GPU ( The General Prosecutor’s Office of Ukraine) for 12 years and they created such a thing where they take any case and see where arbitrariness goes. Well, you understand that the prosecutor, who worked for 12 years at the GPU, he immediately sees where the procedural terror has gone. And he says: "This is my conclusion is that the enterprise is either truly not guilty or guilty to this extent, but it’s being heavily targeted regardless. And who is targeting them? For example, Sidorov, Petrov, Ivanov. "Every problem, every crime has a name, surname, and patronymic, as Stalin used to say. So here's what we do: first - we form this list of marauders the time will come to use it, it will come. And now we are exposing them in the media, we have hired investigators, but half of the investigators that you see are schemes and money. Information is received even from us. When a businessman exposes, security forces begin to attack the businessman. And when a businessman takes this information,passes it on to an investigative journalist and he publishes the material on his own, therefore no one loves journalists, there's nothing to take from them. It’s another matter to come to me. I have a business

"X-park", and it can be taken away, for example. Just for the fact that I once disclosed them. But when an investigator-journalist did it, it resonates much more and it is not about me defending some rights of my businessman friend, but it is already interpreted as an injustice that exists in general in citizenship. Thus, the marauder, the National Investigation Bureau (NIB), and the investigations are three blocks that currently the most effective. Do you see that almost all courts, such as Mazepa's case, have have multiple decisions regarding the return of items seized during searches. Now, they are simply not enforcing these decisions. I have two decisions granting access to the case materials. I don’t even know what my property was seized for! I have no idea. And they don't let me to understand the reason, they say: "Secret investigation and that's all." The court says: "Show me," and he says: " I think I shouldn't show you anything." That is, it is lawlessness and unbelief. And here we are He has seven decisions, I have two decisions. And what to do?! - media. Thank you for at least allowing us to tell this through the media. And it turns out that as soon as there’s a public outcry, as soon as someone gets caught prosecutor's hand, no one saw him after that! He was stealing money for a year and a half, but for some reason, no one checked that safe, and as soon as the businessman and we raised this issue, NABU immediately noticed him and took him to court, and of course they released him on personal recognizance. He is the "chosen one". Therefore, the "White Business Club", "

White Protesters Club", "Green Business Club" are all "chosen". And these chosen ones are Yanukovych's family... That's why we treat them like that. And I think that it will be always like that, if after a year, as you said, that after some time they will say that it has become ineffective; I’m predicting right now that it will be. They’ll say it was a mistake, just another one mistake. It was a bright poster-feature, it passed, but as always, the effectiveness of it is 0!